<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of Strategy Gaming is Greatly Exaggerated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topofcool.com/2006/02/death-of-strategy-gaming-is-greatly-exaggerated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topofcool.com/2006/02/death-of-strategy-gaming-is-greatly-exaggerated/</link>
	<description>Your tongues can't repel taste of this magnitude!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Botswana</title>
		<link>http://www.topofcool.com/2006/02/death-of-strategy-gaming-is-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Botswana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=140#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Sounds encouraging. To be honest, even though I am a long time turn-based fan, the latest games have been something of a turn off. I just could not get Civ III started to save my life. It seemed overcomplicated for its own sake and I finally gave up when I realized it felt more like work.

It seems like we are in a phase right now where games seem more like work than entertainment, which is a deadly time to be developing turn-based games that have a natural built-in "slog factor" already. I don't know if one good game being released, or even two if you count Civ IV, is going to save the genre. There was a time, hard as it might seem to believe, that a few turn-based strategy games were released every quarter. Not the few a year we're lucky to see now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds encouraging. To be honest, even though I am a long time turn-based fan, the latest games have been something of a turn off. I just could not get Civ III started to save my life. It seemed overcomplicated for its own sake and I finally gave up when I realized it felt more like work.</p>
<p>It seems like we are in a phase right now where games seem more like work than entertainment, which is a deadly time to be developing turn-based games that have a natural built-in &#8220;slog factor&#8221; already. I don&#8217;t know if one good game being released, or even two if you count Civ IV, is going to save the genre. There was a time, hard as it might seem to believe, that a few turn-based strategy games were released every quarter. Not the few a year we&#8217;re lucky to see now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Goodfellow</title>
		<link>http://www.topofcool.com/2006/02/death-of-strategy-gaming-is-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Goodfellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=140#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Who's saying strategy gaming is dead? Strategy gaming is doing fine.

Now turn based strategy gaming...that's another story. And it will take more than GalCiv2 and Civ4 to resurrect that corpse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s saying strategy gaming is dead? Strategy gaming is doing fine.</p>
<p>Now turn based strategy gaming&#8230;that&#8217;s another story. And it will take more than GalCiv2 and Civ4 to resurrect that corpse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
